सामग्रीमा जानुहोस्
प्रदर्शन मोड। प्रगति शक्ति सत्तामा छैन। “नमुना” चिन्ह लगाइएका पृष्ठले शासन-मोडेल कसरी काम गर्छ देखाउँछन्; स्रोत भएका आधार-मान प्रकाशित तथ्याङ्क हुन्; लक्ष्यहरू प्रस्ताव हुन्। यहाँ केही पनि गरिसकेको कामको अभिलेख होइन।
Pragati Shakti
नेपाली
অসমীয়াবাংলাबड़ोsoonडोगरीsoonEnglishગુજરાતીहिन्दीಕನ್ನಡکٲشُرsoonकोंकणीsoonमैथिलीsoonമലയാളംꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟsoonमराठीनेपालीଓଡ଼ିଆਪੰਜਾਬੀसंस्कृतम्soonᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤsoonسنڌيsoonதமிழ்తెలుగుاردو

खैरो भाषाहरूको अनुवाद हुँदैछ; समीक्षकहरूलाई स्वागत छ।

मिसन 2 / ७

शिक्षा र सीप

Improve actual learning, skills, research capability and employability.

EN · अझै अनुवाद भएको छैन — अंग्रेजीमा देखाइएकोजिम्मेवार: Mission Lead — Education & Skillsसाझास्थानीय
नतिजाको क्रम

१० वर्षे नतिजा → ३ वर्षे मिसन → वर्ष १ का लक्ष्य

१० वर्षे नतिजा (वर्ष १० — एक कार्यकालभन्दा पर; नयाँ जनादेशमा निर्भर)

By Year 10: a large majority of children reach grade-level reading and numeracy by Grade 3, and vocational pathways lead to measured employment.

वर्ष ३ को अन्त्यसम्म
  • By end of Year 3: Foundational literacy and numeracy measured independently every year in every district.
  • By end of Year 3: Teacher-practice improvement pilots with randomised evaluation in 3 states.
  • By end of Year 3: Apprenticeship placement-to-job tracking published quarterly.
वर्ष १ का लक्ष्य
Measure learning, not attendance
  • KR · Adopt an independent FLN assessment with published methodologymetric
  • KR · Publish district-level learning dashboards for 200 districts
नाप

नतिजा मेट्रिक

स्रोत भएका अवलोकन प्रकाशित तथ्याङ्क हुन्, जस्ताको तस्तै। लक्ष्यहरू प्रगति शक्तिका प्रस्ताव। जहाँ राष्ट्रिय नाप छैन, हामी बनाउनुको सट्टा त्यही भन्छौं।

Std III children (rural) who can read a Std II-level text

Unit: % · higher is better
आधार-मान
23.4% (2024) स्वतन्त्र अध्ययन · ASER Centre / Pratham
प्रस्तावित लक्ष्य
70% वर्ष 10 सम्म
अवलोकन लग (3) · अन्तिम जाँच 18 Sep 2026
DateValueClassGeographyPeriodPublishedConfidenceSource / note
31 Dec 201820.9स्वतन्त्र अध्ययनIndia (rural)ASER 2018 (rural)Jan 2025HIGHAnnual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2024 — National findings
31 Dec 202216.3स्वतन्त्र अध्ययनIndia (rural)ASER 2022 (rural)Jan 2025HIGHAnnual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2024 — National findings — Post-pandemic low
31 Dec 202423.4स्वतन्त्र अध्ययनIndia (rural)ASER 2024 (rural)Jan 2025HIGHAnnual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2024 — National findings
हामी नाप्छौं
  • Share of Grade 3 children reading at grade level
  • Share of Grade 5 children able to do division
  • Secondary completion with measured competence
  • Apprenticeship-to-employment conversion
  • Graduate employment within 12 months
सफलता यसबाट परिभाषित हुँदैन
  • Enrolment alone
  • Attendance alone
  • Buildings constructed
दायरा

फोकस क्षेत्र र को कार्य गर्न सक्छ

Foundational literacyFoundational numeracyTeacher qualityLearning outcomesVocational educationApprenticeshipsHigher educationResearchAI-era educationSTEMCritical thinkingLifelong learningProfessional skillsEmployability
को कार्य गर्न सक्छ?
  • साझाEducation is on the Concurrent List (List III, Entry 25); both Union and States legislate.
  • स्थानीयSchool management committees and local bodies influence day-to-day operation.
संघीयता व्याख्या →
नमुना कार्यान्वयन तालिका · नमुना

यस मिसनको वर्क बोर्ड कस्तो देखिन्छ (2 नमुना कार्ड)

यी कार्डले अभिलेख राख्ने तरिका देखाउँछन्। कुनै सुरु भएको छैन; मिति पदभार ग्रहणदेखि (Y1 Q1 = पहिलो त्रैमास)।

PS-002

Independent foundational literacy & numeracy assessment

उदाहरण: विस्तारसाझा

Learning outcomes are inferred from enrolment and attendance rather than measured competence.

Owner
Mission Lead — Education & Skills
Baseline
23.4% of rural Std III read Std II text (ASER 2024); no annual district-level series
Target
All districts measured annually with published methodology
Sample dates
Y1 Q1 → Y2 Q3
Est. / actual
₹220 cr / ₹60 cr
KPI
edu-grade3-reading
Priority
20 / 100

Depends on: Assessment design peer review; State education dept access

Risks: Teaching to the test; Sample bias in hard-to-reach blocks

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: first-wave results from 200 districts would enter peer review in Y1 Q2.

PS-015

Teacher-practice coaching RCT (3 states)

उदाहरण: ब्याकलगराज्य

Teacher training is delivered but its effect on learning is unknown.

Owner
Pragati Shakti Labs
Baseline
No causal evidence in Indian context at scale
Target
Randomised evaluation with pre-registered outcomes
Sample dates
Y2 Q1 → Y3 Q4
Est. / actual
₹45 cr / ₹0 cr
KPI
Effect size on FLN scores
Priority
2 / 100

Depends on: PS-002 assessment instrument

Risks: Contamination between arms

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: queued behind the assessment instrument (PS-002).

सिकाइ · नमुना उदाहरण

ल्याब्स परियोजना र जे चलेन

ल्याब्स
  • PILOTFLN assessment instrument
  • IDEATeacher-coaching RCT design
जे चलेन