सामग्रीमा जानुहोस्
प्रदर्शन मोड। प्रगति शक्ति सत्तामा छैन। “नमुना” चिन्ह लगाइएका पृष्ठले शासन-मोडेल कसरी काम गर्छ देखाउँछन्; स्रोत भएका आधार-मान प्रकाशित तथ्याङ्क हुन्; लक्ष्यहरू प्रस्ताव हुन्। यहाँ केही पनि गरिसकेको कामको अभिलेख होइन।
Pragati Shakti
नेपाली
অসমীয়াবাংলাबड़ोsoonडोगरीsoonEnglishગુજરાતીहिन्दीಕನ್ನಡکٲشُرsoonकोंकणीsoonमैथिलीsoonമലയാളംꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟsoonमराठीनेपालीଓଡ଼ିଆਪੰਜਾਬੀसंस्कृतम्soonᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤsoonسنڌيsoonதமிழ்తెలుగుاردو

खैरो भाषाहरूको अनुवाद हुँदैछ; समीक्षकहरूलाई स्वागत छ।

जे चलेन · प्रदर्शन

अप्रभावी कार्यक्रम रोक्नु जिम्मेवार शासन हो

बन्द कार्यक्रमको दर्ता कसरी राखिन्छ: मूल परिकल्पना, खर्च, वास्तविक नतिजा, असफलताको कारण, प्रमाण, पाठ र निर्णय। तलका प्रविष्टि नमुना हुन् — कुनै चलेको छैन।

EN · अझै अनुवाद भएको छैन — अंग्रेजीमा देखाइएको
STOPPEDY1 Q2 (sample)स्वास्थ्य
◌ नमुना

SMS reminder for PHC appointments

Original hypothesis
Automated SMS reminders would reduce missed appointments and waiting-time variance.
Expected outcome
Missed appointments down 20% in 25 PHCs.
Intervention
Bulk SMS 24h before scheduled visit in local language.
Cost
₹0.6 cr
Actual result
Missed appointments fell 3% (not statistically significant). Waiting-time variance unchanged.
Why it failed
Most PHC visits are walk-in; scheduled appointments were a small minority. The intervention targeted a problem that barely existed at the facility level.
Evidence
  • Facility logs from 25 PHCs, 6 months, compared with 25 control PHCs. प्राथमिक सरकारी डेटा
  • Labs evaluation memo, peer reviewed. विज्ञ विश्लेषण
Lessons
  • Validate that the problem exists at the point of intervention before building the fix.
  • Cheap pilots are valuable precisely because they can fail cheaply.
REDESIGNEDY1 Q2 (sample)शिक्षा
◌ नमुना

Tablet-based learning app, Grade 3 (single-district pilot)

Original hypothesis
Adaptive learning software would raise reading scores faster than teacher-led remediation.
Expected outcome
0.2 standard deviation gain in reading in one academic year.
Intervention
Tablets and adaptive app in 40 schools; 40 comparison schools received teacher-led remediation.
Cost
₹2.1 cr
Actual result
No significant difference versus teacher-led remediation; device downtime averaged 30% of school days.
Why it failed
Device maintenance and connectivity were underestimated; teachers used the app as a substitute rather than a supplement.
Evidence
  • Independent assessment of 3,200 children at baseline and endline. स्वतन्त्र अध्ययन
Lessons
  • Technology pilots must budget for maintenance as a first-class cost.
  • Compare against the best cheap alternative, not against doing nothing.
REPLACEDY1 Q3 (sample)जलवायु · ऊर्जा · पानी
◌ नमुना

Recharge-structure count as a groundwater KPI

Original hypothesis
Counting recharge structures built would track groundwater improvement.
Expected outcome
Structures built would correlate with water-table recovery.
Intervention
KPI adopted for first two quarters of PS-014.
Cost
₹0 cr
Actual result
Structure counts rose; water-table readings showed no relationship because most structures were sited without hydrogeological assessment.
Why it failed
Output measured instead of outcome. The KPI incentivised construction, not recharge.
Evidence
  • Piezometer readings vs. structure inventory across 8 blocks. प्राथमिक सरकारी डेटा
Lessons
  • Never adopt an output KPI as a proxy for an outcome without evidence of correlation.
  • Site selection needs hydrogeology, not just budget.