भारत कसरी शासित हुन सक्छ — एक प्रस्ताव, र यसपछाडिको समूह
यस साइटमा दुई फरक कुरा छन्: प्रगति शक्ति आज के हो, र यसले चलाउन प्रस्ताव गर्ने सरकार। यो पृष्ठले तिनलाई अलग राख्छ।
कसले बनायो, यो के हो, कसले सम्हाल्छ
- Current status
- Pragati Shakti is at the proposal stage. It is not a registered political party and does not hold, and has never held, office at any level of government.
- Who created it
- This proposal and website were created by a small founding group of citizens and professionals working in their personal capacity.
- Who maintains it
- The site is maintained by the founding group. Content changes are made through a version-controlled repository so that every edit to a commitment, number or policy is recorded.
- Registration
- Registration with the Election Commission of India: to be published when applied for.
- Contact
- contact@pragatishakti.org — we reply to every message; where it concerns a policy, our response is published on that policy's page. Postal address: to be published.
- Members and the counter
- Membership: the counter on the homepage records people who have chosen to subscribe to the idea.
- Funding
- Funding to date: to be published under Transparency › Pragati Shakti today.
Items marked “to be published” are intentionally blank until the founding group publishes them. We do not fill gaps with placeholders that look like facts.
वास्तविक मानिस, भूमिका र खुलासासहित
Names, roles and interest disclosures of the founding team: to be published. When published, each person will be listed by role with a public conflict-of-interest disclosure, as required by the organisation's own rules under How we would govern › Organisational governance.
By design there is no leader photograph and no personality branding anywhere on this site. Leadership is meant to be replaceable; institutions are meant to outlast leaders.
प्रगति शक्ति सरकार कसरी सङ्गठित हुन्छ
यो एक प्रस्ताव हो। यी निकायमध्ये कुनै आज छैन।
- Pragati Shakti Council
- 7 National Missions
- Mission Lead
- Policy · Economics · Data · Technology · Legal · Programme Management · Domain Specialists
- State Teams
- District / Local Feedback
- Citizen + Expert Input
Every initiative would have one accountable owner, expressed as a role. The national leader would not be the approval bottleneck; mission leads would own their backlogs within the Council's published guard-rails.
Full detail, including the first 100 days, authority and dependencies, fiscal rules and decision-making, is in How we would govern.
Focus, measurement, transparency, experimentation, accountability, federalism
Seven missions, not dozens. Explicit work-in-progress limits.
Outcomes, not inputs. Sourced baselines; append-only records.
Organisational finances now; a government disclosure model for later.
Labs would let policies fail cheaply first.
One owner per initiative. Kill criteria stated before launch.
Union, State, Local, Shared — stated on every policy.
Leadership replaceable; institutions survive leaders.
A rolling ten-year programme, honest about what needs a second mandate.
All figures with a cited source are published statistics; targets are proposals; delivery records marked “simulated” are demonstrations. The platform, its data and its API are open — see the API documentation.