Transparency

Two different things, kept apart

First, the organisation as it exists today — its funding, spending and disclosures, wherever available. Second, a model of how a Pragati Shakti government would disclose public spending, tenders, delivery and audit findings. The second part is made of sample records.

Part 1 · Pragati Shakti today

The actual organisation

No financial statements have been published yet. When they are, they will use exactly the template below, quarterly, with an annual external audit.

Financial statements

Not yet published

Donor disclosures

Not yet published

Office-bearer disclosures

Not yet published

External audit

Not yet published

Income will be reported as

Donations by band (count and total per band)
Membership fees
Other income (specified)

Expenditure will be reported as

Research and pilots
Staff
Platform and data infrastructure
State/local operations
Administration and audit

Disclosures will include

Donors above the statutory threshold, named
Office-bearers' conflict-of-interest declarations
Related-party transactions
External audit opinion, published in full

We publish the template now so the format is fixed before the first numbers exist. No invented donors, salaries or disclosures appear on this site.

Part 2 · Government transparency model

How public money and decisions would be disclosed if elected

Every record in this part is a hypothetical sample showing the format. Nothing here has been spent, tendered, audited or corrected.

◌ Simulated

Programme spending vs. voted budget

Programme	Voted	Spent	Variance	Note
Emergency care within 30 minutes (sample)	₹350 cr (Y1)	₹90 cr	−74% (pilot phase; capex back-loaded)	Hypothetical figures demonstrating the format.

Procurement — open by default (sample records)

ID	Item	Method	Bidders	Awarded	Published
SAMPLE-PRC-001	GIS travel-time modelling services	Open tender	5	₹0.6 cr	Y1 Q1
SAMPLE-PRC-002	Foundational-learning assessment field operations (200 districts)	Open tender	4	₹1.2 cr	Y1 Q1
SAMPLE-PRC-003	Piezometer supply (20 blocks)	Open tender (re-issued after single bid)	2	₹0.35 cr	Y1 Q2

Rule: award criteria published before bidding; contract summaries after award; single-source justifications public.

Audit findings (sample)

Y1 Q2CLOSED
Two Labs contracts lacked documented conflict-of-interest checks before award.
Response: Checks made a mandatory gate in the procurement workflow; retro-applied to both contracts.
Y1 Q2CLOSED
Metric observations for the groundwater pilot were recorded without a geography field.
Response: Schema now enforces geography; observations back-filled with revision notes.

Rule: findings published unedited, with the government's response alongside.

Corrections log (sample)

Y1 Q3 — Groundwater KPI replaced (structures built → water-table response). Historical observations retained under the old metric. detail
Y1 Q2 — Tablet-learning pilot result restated after independent endline; earlier interim gain withdrawn. detail

Rule: corrections append a revision; nothing is overwritten.

Office-holder disclosure template

Role	Interests held (financial, directorships, prior employment)	Recusals in the period	Date filed	Verified by
example	example	example	example	example

Filed annually by ministers, mission leads and Labs reviewers; recusals logged and published.

Open data

Datasets and methodology

Dataset	Format	Endpoint
Metrics & observations (sourced baselines)	JSON	/api/metrics
Sample work board (simulated)	JSON	/api/kanban
Proposed dashboard (baseline + target + simulated record)	JSON	/api/dashboard
What Didn't Work register (simulated)	JSON	/api/failures
Missions	JSON	/api/missions
Policies	JSON	/api/policies

Every metric observation carries source, method, geography, confidence and evidence class; observations are append-only and version-controlled. See API documentation.