ಸಾರ್ವಜನಿಕ ವರ್ಕ್ ಬೋರ್ಡ್ · ಪ್ರದರ್ಶನ

ಸಾರ್ವಜನಿಕ ವರ್ಕ್ ಬೋರ್ಡ್ ಹೇಗೆ ನಡೆಯುತ್ತದೆ

ಒಂದು ಮಾದರಿ ಅನುಷ್ಠಾನ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿ: ಹದಿಮೂರು ಹಂತಗಳು, ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟ ಕೆಲಸ-ಪ್ರಗತಿ ಮಿತಿಗಳು. ಪ್ರತಿ ಕಾರ್ಡ್ ಮಾದರಿ — ದಿನಾಂಕಗಳು ಅಧಿಕಾರ ಸ್ವೀಕಾರದಿಂದ (Y1 Q1 = ಮೊದಲ ತ್ರೈಮಾಸಿಕ), ಯಾವುದೂ ಆರಂಭವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ. WIP ಮಿತಿ ಇರುವ ಕಾಲಮ್‌ಗಳು ಪ್ರಸ್ತುತ / ಮಿತಿ ತೋರಿಸುತ್ತವೆ.

EN · ಇನ್ನೂ ಅನುವಾದವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ — ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ತೋರಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ

Backlog

PS-015

Teacher-practice coaching RCT (3 states)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಬ್ಯಾಕ್‌ಲಾಗ್ರಾಜ್ಯ

Teacher training is delivered but its effect on learning is unknown.

Owner: Pragati Shakti Labs
Baseline: No causal evidence in Indian context at scale
Target: Randomised evaluation with pre-registered outcomes
Sample dates: Y2 Q1 → Y3 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹45 cr / ₹0 cr
KPI: Effect size on FLN scores
Priority: 2 / 100

Depends on: PS-002 assessment instrument

Risks: Contamination between arms

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: queued behind the assessment instrument (PS-002).

PS-016

National compute access for AI research

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಬ್ಯಾಕ್‌ಲಾಗ್ಕೇಂದ್ರ⚠ ನಿಧಿಯಿಲ್ಲ

Public research institutions lack compute to do frontier AI work.

Owner: Mission Lead — Technology & Digital State
Baseline: Fragmented access
Target: Evaluated programme with research-output metrics
Sample dates: Y2 Q1 → Y4 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹2.5k cr / ₹0 cr
KPI: Peer-reviewed output and fielded systems per ₹ crore
Priority: 0 / 100

Depends on: Power availability; Procurement reform

Risks: Under-utilisation; Vendor lock-in

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: blocked — no funding source identified; stays unfunded until one is.

Problem validation

1 / 6

PS-009

Veteran transition employment tracking

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಸಂಶೋಧನೆಕೇಂದ್ರ

Transition outcomes for veterans are not systematically measured.

Owner: Mission Lead — Defence & Strategic Security
Baseline: Not measured
Target: 12-month employment outcome tracked in 2 regions
Sample dates: Y1 Q2 → Y2 Q3
Est. / actual: ₹15 cr / ₹0 cr
KPI: Veteran employment within 12 months
Priority: 2 / 100

Depends on: Resettlement directorate data access

Risks: Low survey response

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: problem statement validated with veteran organisations in Y1 Q2.

Evidence review

1 / 6

PS-006

Insurance payout within 30 days

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಸಂಶೋಧನೆಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Long claim-to-payout delays make crop insurance ineffective as risk management.

Owner: Mission Lead — Agriculture & Food Systems
Baseline: Payout timelines not consistently published
Target: Median ≤ 30 days in pilot states
Sample dates: Y1 Q2 → Y2 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹60 cr / ₹1 cr
KPI: Median days claim-to-payout
Priority: 5 / 100

Depends on: Insurer data sharing; Yield-estimation technology validation

Risks: Moral hazard if assessment automated poorly

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: evidence review of satellite yield estimation in Y1 Q2.

Policy design

1 / 5

PS-003

Verified DISCOM reliability reporting

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಸಂಶೋಧನೆಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Supply interruption data is self-reported and inconsistent across DISCOMs.

Owner: Mission Lead — Climate, Energy & Water
Baseline: Self-reported SAIDI, no third-party audit
Target: Third-party verified SAIDI/SAIFI for all DISCOMs
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y2 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹80 cr / ₹4 cr
KPI: cew-supply-interruption
Priority: 5 / 100

Depends on: Smart-meter data access agreements; State regulator consent

Risks: DISCOM resistance to disclosure

Y1 Q1 — Sample schedule: verification protocol drafted in Y1 Q1 and sent for expert review.

Public / expert consultation

1 / 4

PS-004

Airshed pollution management (10 cities)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಸಂಶೋಧನೆಹಂಚಿಕೆ

City-level plans ignore cross-boundary sources; exposure not tracked at population level.

Owner: Mission Lead — Climate, Energy & Water
Baseline: 50.6 µg/m³ annual avg PM2.5, 2024 (IQAir)
Target: Airshed plans with quarterly exposure reporting
Sample dates: Y1 Q2 → Y3 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹650 cr / ₹12 cr
KPI: cew-pm25-exposure
Priority: 2 / 100

Depends on: Inter-state coordination mechanism; Monitor procurement

Risks: Source attribution disputes between states; Seasonal confounding

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: public consultation would run for six weeks in Y1 Q2.

Legal review

1 / 4

PS-011

Business closure time reduction

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಸಂಶೋಧನೆಕೇಂದ್ರ

Closing a business takes years, trapping capital and discouraging formation.

Owner: Mission Lead — Economy, Jobs & Taxation
Baseline: To be measured
Target: Median voluntary closure ≤ 6 months in pilot
Sample dates: Y1 Q2 → Y3 Q1
Est. / actual: ₹25 cr / ₹2 cr
KPI: Median days to voluntary closure
Priority: 2 / 100

Depends on: MCA process access; Insolvency framework interaction

Risks: Creditor protection weakened

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: legal review of interaction with IBC provisions in Y1 Q2.

Fiscal review

1 / 4

PS-005

Cold-chain loss-reduction pilot (15 districts)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಸಂಶೋಧನೆರಾಜ್ಯ

High post-harvest loss in perishables depresses farmer price realisation.

Owner: Mission Lead — Agriculture & Food Systems
Baseline: Fruits 6–15%, vegetables 5–12% (NABCONS 2020-22)
Target: Measured loss reduction ≥ 5 percentage points in pilot districts
Sample dates: Y1 Q2 → Y3 Q2
Est. / actual: ₹400 cr / ₹0 cr
KPI: agri-post-harvest-loss
Priority: 2 / 100

Depends on: Loss-measurement protocol (PS-012); Private cold-chain operators

Risks: Stranded assets if demand aggregation fails; Power reliability

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: fiscal review would test the recurring energy-cost assumption before any pilot spend.

Pilot

2 / 7

PS-001

30-minute emergency care access

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಪೈಲಟ್ಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Large populations cannot reach functioning emergency care quickly; baseline not independently validated.

Owner: Mission Lead — Health
Baseline: Not measured nationally (LAB-01 building baseline)
Target: 80% by Year 3; 95% by Year 10
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y3 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹1.8k cr / ₹90 cr
KPI: health-emergency-access
Priority: 3 / 100

Depends on: State health department MoUs (12 districts); GIS travel-time dataset

Risks: Ambulance staffing shortfalls; Referral hospitals overloaded

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: pilot would begin in 12 districts in Y1 Q2; first travel-time audit at the end of Y1.

PS-007

'Tell us once' — 5 high-volume services

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಪೈಲಟ್ಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Citizens repeatedly re-submit data government already legitimately holds.

Owner: Mission Lead — Technology & Digital State
Baseline: Not measured; form-field audit in pilot
Target: < 25% in pilot services by Year 2
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y2 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹150 cr / ₹22 cr
KPI: tech-resubmission-rate
Priority: 5 / 100

Depends on: Consent framework legal review; State service integration

Risks: Privacy breach via over-broad data sharing; Legacy system integration failure

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: first two services would go live only after the privacy audit is published.

Measurement

2 / 7

PS-002

Independent foundational literacy & numeracy assessment

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ವಿಸ್ತರಣೆಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Learning outcomes are inferred from enrolment and attendance rather than measured competence.

Owner: Mission Lead — Education & Skills
Baseline: 23.4% of rural Std III read Std II text (ASER 2024); no annual district-level series
Target: All districts measured annually with published methodology
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y2 Q3
Est. / actual: ₹220 cr / ₹60 cr
KPI: edu-grade3-reading
Priority: 20 / 100

Depends on: Assessment design peer review; State education dept access

Risks: Teaching to the test; Sample bias in hard-to-reach blocks

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: first-wave results from 200 districts would enter peer review in Y1 Q2.

PS-010

MSME compliance-cost baseline (5 sectors)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಪೈಲಟ್ಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Regulatory burden on MSMEs is asserted but not measured.

Owner: Mission Lead — Economy, Jobs & Taxation
Baseline: No baseline
Target: Published cost-of-compliance baseline
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y1 Q4
Est. / actual: ₹12 cr / ₹7 cr
KPI: econ-msme-compliance-cost
Priority: 17 / 100

Depends on: Industry association participation

Risks: Self-reporting bias

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: fieldwork in three sectors during Y1 Q1–Q2.

Revision

1 / 3

PS-014

Groundwater recharge with metered outcomes (20 blocks)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ವಿಳಂಬರಾಜ್ಯ

Recharge structures are built without measuring aquifer response.

Owner: Mission Lead — Climate, Energy & Water
Baseline: Structures counted, not outcomes
Target: Metered water-table response in 20 blocks
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y2 Q2
Est. / actual: ₹90 cr / ₹31 cr
KPI: Water-table change vs. control blocks
Priority: 2 / 100

Depends on: Piezometer network; CGWB collaboration

Risks: Monsoon variability masks effect

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule (showing a slip): piezometer procurement delayed four months; design revised to add control blocks.

Scaling

1 / 5

PS-008

Open-data publication standard (3 states)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ವಿಸ್ತರಣೆರಾಜ್ಯ

Government data is released as PDFs or not at all; cannot be audited or reused.

Owner: Mission Lead — Technology & Digital State
Baseline: Ad hoc releases
Target: Machine-readable releases with schemas in 3 states
Sample dates: Y1 Q1 → Y2 Q2
Est. / actual: ₹30 cr / ₹11 cr
KPI: Share of datasets machine-readable
Priority: 12 / 100

Depends on: State IT departments

Risks: Standard adopted on paper only

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: standard v1.0 adopted by one state in Y1 Q2; two more to follow.

Delivered

PS-012

Post-harvest loss measurement protocol

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಪೂರ್ಣಹಂಚಿಕೆ

Loss figures are inconsistent across studies; no standard protocol.

Owner: Pragati Shakti Labs
Baseline: No standard
Target: Peer-reviewed protocol applied to 5 crops
Sample dates: Y1 Q4 → Y1 Q2
Est. / actual: ₹3 cr / ₹2.6 cr
KPI: Protocol published and adopted
Priority: 29 / 100

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: protocol v1.0 published by Y1 Q2; feeds PS-005.

Continuous monitoring

PS-013

PHC waiting-time measurement (50 PHCs)

ಉದಾಹರಣೆ: ಪೂರ್ಣರಾಜ್ಯ

Waiting time at primary facilities is unmeasured, so quality cannot be managed.

Owner: Mission Lead — Health
Baseline: Unmeasured
Target: Monthly public waiting-time data from 50 PHCs
Sample dates: Y1 Q4 → Y1 Q2
Est. / actual: ₹4 cr / ₹3.8 cr
KPI: Median waiting time (minutes)
Priority: 29 / 100

Risks: Gaming via token manipulation

Y1 Q2 — Sample schedule: live from Y1 Q2 with anomaly detection flagging facilities for audit.